Summary · Question 3 of 14

Norwegian players in the top-9 leagues by position group and age cohort, 2025/26

The largest cohort gap is defenders aged 23-25: 1 Norwegian players against a peer median of 2.

GroupCohortNORPeer median
Defenders 23-25 1 2
Defenders 30+ 2 2
Forwards 23-25 1 1
Forwards 30+ 1 0.5
Midfielders U22 2 1.5

How to read it: each row is one position group and age cohort, sorted by the size of the gap; the NOR column counts Norwegian players with at least 450 minutes in a top-9 league, the bar the median count across the peer countries. Cells are counts of players, not estimates.

How we know

As an analytics question In numbers: Norwegian player count against the peer-country median, by age cohort and position group, ≥ 450 minutes, 2025/26 season.

What we did We split players into position groups and age bands, counted how many the home nation had in each one, and compared that count with the middle value among the other countries.

Sources Age at season start; cohorts U22 / 23–25 / 26–29 / 30+; ≥ 450 minutes; outfield players only (goalkeepers are counted on the goalkeeper page), and a player with rows in two position groups counts in each.

What this means

Norway’s shortfall against the peer median is largest for defenders aged 23-25. The cells are single-digit counts with no interval: a difference of one or two players can come from a single transfer, loan or injury. The table shows where the counts differ, not how certain or how lasting the difference is.

What this does not show

Goalkeepers, who are counted separately; players below 450 minutes; players outside the nine leagues; and anything about the players in a cell beyond their number.

Data snapshot: FBref tables fetched 14 September 2026, snapshot commit ef7dbd4 · code: src/international_benchmark.py · status: exploratory, not pre-registered · all limitations

Explore the data

Benchmark vs peer countries

Structural benchmark vs peer countries

The tables below count Norwegian players in the top-9 leagues by position group and age cohort against the peer countries, from the same season tables as every other count in the atlas.

Cohort gaps — forwards

Cohort U2223-2526-2930+
Norway 1 1 4 1
Denmark 1 7 2 —
Switzerland — 1 3 —
Austria 1 2 — 1
Czechia — 1 2 2

Cohort gaps — midfielders

Cohort U2223-2526-2930+
Norway 2 9 11 4
Denmark 6 6 13 6
Switzerland 4 6 10 3
Austria 2 6 4 7
Czechia 1 2 3 1

Cohort gaps — defenders

Cohort U2223-2526-2930+
Norway 3 1 5 2
Denmark 2 5 7 2
Switzerland 2 5 4 6
Austria 1 3 5 1
Czechia — 1 3 3

* Count and median npG+A per 90 of players with the country's nationality in a top-9 league, 2025/26, at least 450 minutes; cohort by age at the season's calendar turn (start year + 1 − birth year). 5 of the 9 countries are shown; the heatmap above carries all of them. Largest Norwegian shortfalls against the peer median count: defenders 23-25 (1 vs 2), defenders 30+ (2 vs 2), forwards 23-25 (1 vs 1).

The full picture, all nine peer countries at once, as a heatmap:

Heatmap of the international cohort benchmark: 9 countries by position group and age cohort, 2025/26 season; the Norwegian row is outlined.
Median non-penalty goals + assists per 90 by country, position group and age cohort, 2025/26; the outlined row is Norway.

Observations

Per capita: rank 3 of 9 · The largest cohort gap: defenders 23-25 · Trajectories 2024/25 → 2025/26: mostly stable

Per capita: rank 3 of 9

52 Norwegian players on 2025/26 rosters of the nine strongest leagues give 9.37 per million inhabitants, rank 3 of 9. Denmark leads with 12.58, 1.3 times the Norwegian density; Croatia sits one place above with 12.18 from 47 players and a population 1.4 times smaller. Below Norway: Switzerland, Austria, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, Poland.

The largest cohort gap: defenders 23-25

Counting 2025/26 top-9 players by position group and age cohort and comparing the Norwegian count with the median of the other eight peers, the three largest shortfalls are defenders 23-25 — 1 Norwegian against a peer median of 2; defenders 30+ — 2 Norwegian against a peer median of 2; forwards 23-25 — 1 Norwegian against a peer median of 1. The cohort tables above show the medians behind the counts.

Trajectories 2024/25 → 2025/26: mostly stable

101 Norwegian-eligible players had at least 900 minutes in both 2024/25 and 2025/26: forwards 19 (7 up, 8 stable, 4 down); midfielders 42 (8 up, 30 stable, 4 down); defenders 40 (6 up, 31 stable, 3 down). A move counts as up or down when league-adjusted goals + assists per 90 changed by more than 0.05; 69 of 101 stayed within that band. These are season-over-season deltas, not projections.