Summary · Question 3 of 14
Explore the data
Benchmark vs peer countries
Structural benchmark vs peer countries
The tables below count Czech players in the top-9 leagues by position group and age cohort against the peer countries, from the same season tables as every other count in the atlas.
Cohort gaps — forwards
| Cohort | U22 | 23-25 | 26-29 | 30+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czechia | — | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Denmark | 1 | 7 | 2 | — |
| Croatia | — | 3 | — | 2 |
| Austria | 1 | 2 | — | 1 |
| Switzerland | — | 1 | 3 | — |
Cohort gaps — midfielders
| Cohort | U22 | 23-25 | 26-29 | 30+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Denmark | 6 | 6 | 13 | 6 |
| Croatia | — | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Austria | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Switzerland | 4 | 6 | 10 | 3 |
Cohort gaps — defenders
| Cohort | U22 | 23-25 | 26-29 | 30+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czechia | — | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Denmark | 2 | 5 | 7 | 2 |
| Croatia | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Austria | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
* Count and median npG+A per 90 of players with the country's nationality in a top-9 league, 2025/26, at least 450 minutes; cohort by age at the season's calendar turn (start year + 1 − birth year). 5 of the 9 countries are shown; the heatmap above carries all of them. Largest Czech shortfalls against the peer median count: midfielders 23-25 (2 vs 6), midfielders 26-29 (3 vs 6), midfielders 30+ (1 vs 3.5).
The full picture, all nine peer countries at once, as a heatmap:
Observations
Per capita: rank 7 of 9 · The largest cohort gap: midfielders 23-25 · Trajectories 2024/25 → 2025/26: mostly stable
Per capita: rank 7 of 9
26 Czech players on 2025/26 rosters of the nine strongest leagues give 2.39 per million inhabitants, rank 7 of 9. Denmark leads with 12.58, 5.3 times the Czech density; Slovakia sits one place above with 3.14 from 17 players and a population 2.0 times smaller. Below Czechia: Hungary, Poland.
The largest cohort gap: midfielders 23-25
Counting 2025/26 top-9 players by position group and age cohort and comparing the Czech count with the median of the other eight peers, the three largest shortfalls are midfielders 23-25 — 2 Czech against a peer median of 6; midfielders 26-29 — 3 Czech against a peer median of 6; midfielders 30+ — 1 Czech against a peer median of 3.5. The cohort tables above show the medians behind the counts.
Trajectories 2024/25 → 2025/26: mostly stable
92 Czech-eligible players had at least 900 minutes in both 2024/25 and 2025/26: forwards 13 (5 up, 6 stable, 2 down); midfielders 43 (3 up, 31 stable, 9 down); defenders 36 (1 up, 34 stable, 1 down). A move counts as up or down when league-adjusted goals + assists per 90 changed by more than 0.05; 71 of 92 stayed within that band. These are season-over-season deltas, not projections.